For firmwide findings, where findings are identified on issues that have already been raised by IAASA in the preceding 12 months, no action will be taken. This is because the relevant areas would be assessed again in either a follow up visit or as part of a full inspection after the 12 month implementation period. If, following the 12 month implementation period, repeat findings are identified, the severity indicator assigned to the finding would be elevated and a more robust recommendation would be required. This response is not generally applicable to individual audit inspection findings except in the rare circumstance where the same audit is selected for a second inspection within 12 months.
News
Other news
-
Publication of Corrective Public Notice: Petra Diamonds US$ Treasury plc annual report and financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2025
IAASA performed a follow…
-
IAASA publishes reports on the quality assurance review of firms that audit public- interest entities
Today, IAASA has published…
-
PABs’ Governance of Regulatory Frameworks – Risk Management
IAASA’s Professional Body Supervision…
-
Outcome of financial statement examinations completed in 2025
IAASA has published a paper summarising…
Home » What are the consequences where repeat findings are identified within the 12 month implementation period?
Other news
-
Publication of Corrective Public Notice: Petra Diamonds US$ Treasury plc annual report and financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2025
IAASA performed a follow…
-
IAASA publishes reports on the quality assurance review of firms that audit public- interest entities
Today, IAASA has published…
-
PABs’ Governance of Regulatory Frameworks – Risk Management
IAASA’s Professional Body Supervision…
-
Outcome of financial statement examinations completed in 2025
IAASA has published a paper summarising…